Lady Catherine's Necklace by Joan Aiken - What is it about Lady Catherine's necklace, that it is so often stolen or misplaced in Pride and Prejudice sequels? This has to be at least the fourth of fifth I've read in which this is the case. Anyway, Joan Aiken is widely regarded as a superb storyteller and one of the best at providing sequels to Jane Austen's work. For myself, though, I am not impressed. For whatever reason, her style does not resonate with me, and this particular story seemed to be flying in too many different directions and with a very unsatisfactory conclusion.
The premise of this "Jane Austen Entertainment" is that a brother and sister, the Delavals, find themselves stranded at Rosings after Miss Delaval is injured in a carriage accident. Lady Catherine reluctantly invites them to stay until the injury is healed, which takes a remarkably long time. Mr Delaval ingratiates himself with Lady Catherine to the point that she takes his advice on improving her gardens. The improvement calls for a certain cottage to be demolished, thus leaving the two painters that have lived there for many years homeless. Lady Anne de Bourgh is upset about this, but feels she can do little about it. Then Lady Catherine decides to pay a visit to a sister-in-law, and Anne makes the most of some new-found freedom in her mother's absence, by visiting the friends in the cottage frequently, and building a friendship with the garden-boy. On her journey, Lady Catherine's carriage meets with disaster and she is stranded at a remote farm with a farmer of dubious character. As a background to all of this, Maria Lucas is visiting her sister Charlotte and keeping her company while Mr Collins is called away. Since Colonel FitzWilliam is in the area, we find that he and Maria have a bit of a past together and there is a hint that they may find happiness together.
Even in my brief and simplified description, it seems like there are at least three plots for the story, along with several sub-plots. At less than 200 pages, it's quite an undertaking to develop all these storylines sufficiently, and the narrative jumps from one to another willy-nilly. There is far too much going on and at the expense of character development. In addition, several of the events and circumstances are far-fetched and ridiculous. At some points I felt that the characters had little in common with those invented by Austen other than their name.
I questioned a number of aspects of the story, and will mention a few here, as examples of the inconsistency of the writing. 1) At the outset of the story, Anne is said to be about seventeen years old. Only a few pages later, the friendship between Anne and the two painters is said to have begun about three years earlier, when Anne was about sixteen years of age. Which is it? 2) Are we really expected to believe that Lady Catherine placidly accepts how ill she has been used when she finds that her own relatives plotted to have her detained while on her visit to her sister-in-law? And that Lady Catherine's brother really needed to resort to such subterfuge in order to hunt about for his belongings in Lady's C's attics? 3) What happened to change the characters of Mr Collins and FitzWilliam? Mr Collins appears only briefly and has remarkably little to say. Had FitzWilliam not been identified by name, he would not have been recognizable as the cheerful, witty, but self-deprecating gentleman Austen told us about. 4) Are we so lacking in choices of names that Charlotte's midwife had to be named Mrs Hurst? Or maybe we are not supposed to remember that Charles Bingley's sister was a Mrs Hurst.
In the end, I felt the story was inept in resolving any of the conflicts that it presented, and the conclusion was abrupt and disappointing. Half the cast simply disappears as we turn the page to the last chapter, and we get brief descriptions of where they've gone and why only as Lady Catherine's brother tells her where they've all run off to. And apparently, she has little reaction to any of it, as shocking as the news is. In other words, nothing is really resolved, the reader simply comes to the last page in the book with most of the characters having disappeared. I didn't love the other book by Joan Aiken that I read (Jane Fairfax) and considered this one rather a waste of my time, so I will not be likely to read her work again.