I'm going to combine three books in one post, because I'm not prepared to endorse any of them. There is an overabundance of Jane Austen Fan Fiction out there, and the quality varies widely. Most are what I call "fluffy" novels and while I've read several that are quite entertaining and well done, it seems that a large percentage of this genre are cheap attempts by mediocre authors to capitalize on the popularity of Austen's characters and are a waste of time. I do read reviews by readers in order to choose which of these novels are what I would consider trash and avoid those. Of the following three books, I rather wish I'd completely avoided one of them, and I could have lived a full and happy life without having read the other two.
Darcy and Fitzwilliam by Karen V. Wasylowski - This book completely failed to live up to the reviews I saw, and honestly I wonder if the editor that wrote the blurb for the book jacket even read the book. The premise is supposed to be the friendship between Mr Darcy and his cousin, Colonel Fitzwilliam, and the events follow those of
Pride and Prejudice. The book cover indicates that Fitzwilliam assists Darcy in his 'botched marriage proposals' but there is only one proposal that is botched and Fitzwilliam didn't help with it. Furthermore, that happened in P&P and is only referred to briefly in the past tense in this novel. Fail. None of the P&P characters in Wasylowski's story act in keeping with the characters given them by Austen, with the possible exceptions of Col Fitzwilliam and Caroline Bingley. Elizabeth has been turned into an irrational, screaming battle-axe without any of the wit or intelligence for which she is known, and this was most disappointing. The dialogue is flat and childishly vulgar, often laced with what I call potty-mouth. Little attention was paid to the customs and manners of the period, which indicates that the author did not bother to research. For example, throughout the story she has characters referring to each other using only first names. While this may be acceptable between husband and wife alone, or between the two cousins, proper manners would never have allowed Darcy or Fitzwilliam to refer to Lady Catherine deBourgh as simply "Catherine", or for Elizabeth to call her husband anything but "Mr Darcy" in company. Wasylowski had a few good ideas for moving her plots, but with such poor characterization, sketchy timelines, and far-fetched nonsense, she would have been much better off, in my opinion, in creating her own characters for the story rather than cheapening those that Austen gave us. Of course, the book probably wouldn't have found an audience then...
Bottom line: don't bother with this book. I sincerely wish I hadn't.
Mr Darcy Takes A Wife and
Nights and Days at Pemberley by Linda Berdoll - I did know what I was getting into when I decided to read these P&P 'sequels' because the reviews were clear that Berdoll treats Darcy and Elizabeth to an extremely passionate marriage life, but those reviews also extol Berdoll's top-notch storytelling and sweeping plot. Berdoll does tell a good story, and her plots were complex and covered a lot of ground in the narratives. My complaint about the plots themselves would be that there were really just too many of them. Each of the two books run 400+ pages, and have multiple complex subplots with many additional characters. All the characters are quite well-developed, and for the most part the characters from the original P&P are true to their form. I was not happy with the way Darcy was portrayed in the first, however, because in about half the story he is reduced to little more than a lecher, and the reader is given the impression that he is a most honorable man by virtue of his abilities in bed and his unusual decision to give his lustful attention only to his wife. Of course it's honorable to be faithful to marriage, but the author seemed to be saying that Darcy was to be admired because he stopped sowing his wild oats once he fell in love with Elizabeth, and that it was wonderful that he had all that past experience because it made his marriage so much better. I didn't really buy it. But, as Berdoll's goal seemed also to combine a tawdry bodice-ripper with a plenty of intrigue and drama, she needed plenty of bedroom scenes in order to show off her ability to be graphic without using modern or medical terms. (Imagine me rolling my eyes for effect here.) I need to be fair in saying that the plots and characterizations are very good, but I could have done with a little less detail in all those subplots, and a lot less drollery and detail in the scenes meant to convey just how 'satisfying' a relationship Darcy and Elizabeth have.
Bottom line: Pretty good books, but for adults only, and if you're prepared to skim and skip stuff along the way.